all 20 comments

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I remember clear backpacks coming up after the florida school shooting. One interesting counter argument that I remember was feminine hygiene products, or let's call it hemorrhoid or asthma medication. With clear backpacks, these kids and teenagers can't keep their business to themselves. It's prisonification like you said.

My protest would be always having completed homework facing outward, so people can copy it from you.

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Haha. My protest would be putting a brown paper bag inside the clear bag, and putting everything in that. They probably have rules against that though. I bet you could do something like that though

I guess most of them just carry stuff in their pockets or inside their binders in the backpack if they want to hide anything.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hhahah good one. I guess we should put all of our $$ into clear binders while the getting is good.

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I mean seriously there probably is a market for high-end clear backpacks now. The cheap end is probably saturated. It'd be cool if you could make a clear backpack that meets all the rules but still has some privacy compartments or something, to kind of get back at the stupidity of it a bit while providing a backpack that technically meets the rules.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm really into transparency, so I would protest this by wearing clear pants, as well.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe the principal should have to wear clear clothes too. It is for safety, after all /s

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I talked to a student who came to my door selling stuff and they said it was the whole school district that voted for it. So all the middleschools and highschools in the district require it.

And you have to buy the backpack yourself, they don't give you one. And the clear backpacks are terrible in quality to where the binders cut through the plastic, and the cheapest one is $10, that's what the student said. He was sad because he bought a new $40 backpack right before it was voted in this year and now can't use it.

I told him they should stage a sit-in to protest it, but he said their school had already received a call-in threat that year so that's why the school district voted on it.

Interesting stuff. At least to me. I wonder how much this will spread.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

so these backpacks are made of plastic, so it is the big oil who profits first. and plastics are endocrine disruptors and carcinogens, so it is big pharma (a direct offshoot of the oil industry) who profits second. and the police/security state of course too, with a bigger more powerful government. and it means this cheap stuff will all end up in the landfill, degrading nature further. maybe a good way to combat this is to demand the use of sustainable materials...
why are western populations declining? its the lack of freedom. being powerless against moves like this limits your desire to live or to give life.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I couldn't agree more, especially with the police/security angle. And prison systems too, they're creating people who feed right in to the "school to prison pipeline", which is one of the bigger atrocities of our era. This upsets me the most of all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School-to-prison_pipeline

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

yeah, its criminal. these policies are all rooted in the club of rome, united nations, unesco, depopulation agendas. normal americans would never implement any of these

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Greedy ones who profit from it and are far enough removed from the effects would. And those people definitely exist in droves in the US

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sacrificing privacy for security. The Sandyhook conspiracy thing seems a bit flimsy, until you hear about things like this. Kids voting to sacrifice their own privacy. Seems insane, but if they can turn immortally fearless teenagers into cowards then they can easily control their minds. We're in trouble.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kids voting to sacrifice their own privacy.

Well the kids didn't vote for it, the school district's board of directors did. But there are many kids who are being told this is a good idea, some of the buy it, some don't. The kid I talked to seemed on the fence about it. It just started this year, and school just started recently.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

how to make a transparent knife:

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=Fw175kTjTyQ

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Even beyond that, they can just hide a gun in their waistband. The backpack prevents almost nothing. Security theater.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

yeah, hollow out a fat book so it can hold a gun, put the book in the backpack...

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah, there's a million ways if someone really wanted to. But whoever is selling those backpacks is sure making bank, and everyone gets to pretend something was done about the problem, while the issues that caused shooters to become shooters in the first place go unaddressed. That's the real problem, is this kind of lip-service attitude about improving society while addressing none of the real systemic issues that are causing such unhappiness and mental illness in the first place. Instead they just take rights away and punish the people who do follow rules, while nothing is really any safer. Security theater.

[–]i_cansmellthat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, this is conditioning an upcoming generation to trade their rights for safety. Combine this with locker searches and the kids think they have no right to privacy, privacy is dangerous and those that desire it must have something to hide.

There seems to be an uptick of this after school shootings, or after threats are made to schools. Sometimes the students vote it in, or the school board will. And it's not just high school students, some elementary schools have made it mandatory as well.

[–]Helpin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Slippery slope has 2 meanings, note this one shills. He's talking about a literal slope, not the fallacy interpretation that it can be reversed. Logical minded people understand both ways of use. Reddit banned me but I still wanted to say this lol.

[–]Goober_notorious2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So... instead of helping actual kids with issues or the potential for violence......... Wait, yeah this sounds like America at work, I see