The judgement?
Or Giuliani siccing the Trump terrorists on a couple of election volunteers?
Or stopping Giuliani from denying the victims the money by bankrupting himself with legal expenses, while driving up their legal costs?
Needs to be legal to question elections. Slippery slope.
You can question elections without defaming two innocent volunteers.
They whined over nothing. It wasn't defamation but they got a woke judge.
Election in 2000 was rigged. Katherine Harris rigged it and the Supreme Court got it wrong but at least Harris didn't whine about being defamed. They should have just done a recount. In 2020 Georgia was rigged.
They whined over nothing.
You obviously haven't been following the case. They had to flee their homes and their jobs because of the threats from Trump's terrorists.
Election in 2000 was rigged.
The supreme court decided it along party lines, and gave the presidency to the candidate with the fewer votes.
Katherine Harris rigged it and the Supreme Court got it wrong but at least Harris didn't whine about being defamed.
Katherine Harris wasn't warned by the FBI to flee her home for her safety, and she didn't get the cascade of racist comments and threats. And Katherine Harris was a politician. Ruby and Shae were volunteers who wanted to help the country hold a democratic election.
In 2020 Georgia was rigged.
Nope.
Let's have a full recount
Too late I guess. When do we learn from 2000 and 2020, probably never. Elites hate recounts for some reason
False
I've linked to two articles about the results to both recounts.
What exactly is false?
SoCo |6 pointswritten 3 months ago ago
I'm not sure how anyone can not think that something is plainly wrong about this....what a sad state this county has became.