all 4 comments

[–]cant_even 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So; when's he going to clean up that Troon-farm we saw last week?

[–]RankAssPalace 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice try space!

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"Marxist" 🙄 LOL

In case you were in doubt that the USA is an empire in decline, they promote clowns like this guy who are so clueless and ignorant that they think Marxism is a threat to the status quo, as if it were 1935.

[–]GRANNYPOOSY 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I found the first episode of the podcast series "Serial" to be incredibly gripping and thought-provoking. Sarah Koenig's investigation into Adnan Syed's alibi sheds light on the challenges surrounding his conviction for the murder of Hae Min Lee. The episode skillfully highlights the fallibility of human memory and the difficulty of recalling events accurately, even when they occurred just a few weeks prior. One particular aspect that stood out to me was Syed's inability to recall a crucial 21-minute window that could have provided him with a solid alibi. Despite this, there was a lack of concrete physical evidence linking him to the crime. Instead, the state's case heavily relied on the statement of Syed's friend, Jay. What impressed me the most was Syed's honesty throughout the episode. He never claimed to remember anything with 100% certainty or attempted to fill in gaps in his story that would have been advantageous to him. This level of honesty is truly commendable and adds to the complexity of the case. It raises questions about the reliability of witness testimony and the impact it can have on a conviction. Overall, the first episode of "Serial" left me intrigued and eager to continue exploring the details of this captivating case.