you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GuyWhite 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

CNN? Fake news.

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Doesn't matter what you think of CNN or AP. If you don't like this:

A series of invoices and communications obtained by election integrity groups including The Coalition for Good Governance and American Oversight show Defending the Republic contributed millions of dollars toward the push to access voting equipment in key states.

According to invoices obtained by CNN, Powell’s non-profit, Defending the Republic, hired forensics firms that ultimately accessed voting equipment in four swing states won by Biden: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Arizona.

During his interview, which Ryan described to CNN, Ryan says he told federal investigators that Bachenberg worked with Powell and other Trump lawyers to access voting systems in Pennsylvania and other states after the 2020 election.

Tell us how you know that those invoices, interviews, and witnesses are fake. Which portion of this study of voting machines is fake? Teams hired by Trump's lawyers have already admitted that they accessed the machines in order to claim old firmware changed 6000+ QR codes to flip votes to Biden, which has not been debunked: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/28/politics/dominion-voting-system-software-vulnerabilities/index.html The recent access to invoices merely offer additional evidence that Trump's legal teams orchestrated this disinformation campaign, which was debunked by CISA in early 2022 or earlier. Are their claims also fake? Was the election stolen with a few thousand votes in 4 states? What about the additional 8 million votes Biden received?

You cannot refute that information, regardless of which news source you wish to use. If the election integrity groups (their invoices), the FBI, and CNN are lying, discuss your evidence for this. (This is important evidence.)

You nave no credibility if your only comment is 'fake news'.

[–]Armedpleb 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

An account for 6 days and you're already triggered, to the point of providing links to disinformation, in all of those cases. What a brainwashed idiot you are to avoid any legitimate source material or factual content.

[–]Armedpleb 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Account being 6 days old has nothing to do with anything. I spent a long time trying to find a reddit alternative and I just found this site recently. The links I provided are video proof of liberals/democrats confessing and committing voter fraud. How can you say this is disinformation when they are confessing/committing election fraud on camera?

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You can write almost anything you want at Saidit, but there are 3 or 4 users who will identify disinformation. All of your sources include examples that have been debunked, or people who were paid to comment, or a number of other lies, because those websites and prople are highly paid for their services by by wealthy investors. If you genuinely don't know about this, search for each example online, and see what you find.

For example, the 2000 mules disinformation: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-usa-mules-idUSL2N2XJ0OQ

There've always been small attempts at voter fraud, but it's not had any apparent impact on elections: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-fraud-elections-idUSL1N2XP2AI

Disinformation is often out of context: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jan/12/greg-kelly/newsmax-host-recycles-out-context-clip-call-joe-bi/

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    OMG - that changes everything! Fuckface von Clownstick should be President!

    [–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    When the claim is “disinformation,” you know you’re actually right over the target.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    There have been A LOT more than "small" attempts at voter fraud as you can see with dozens of links I've showed you. But in the end, EVERYTHING to you is "disinformation" including video evidence of voter fraud being confessed/committed and all your written fallacies must be TRUE just because you said so.

    [–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No - as you will find if you look for the evidence.