you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]thefirststone 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If courts had interpreted that to mean to enforce protection of a fundamental right at the greatest level afforded by any other State, it sure didn't do much good. And nobody cites it, instead preferring to twist the first into something it isn't. Doesn't sound very useful.

Anyway, like I said, California's State Constitution is much more strict on protecting freedom of speech by any of its government apparatus. How's that working out?