Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich Responds to Biden Admin's Threats: "My Office Is NOT AMUSED With DOJ's POSTURING"

submitted by [deleted] from (thegatewaypundit.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (13 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

    The existence of some cameras doesn't alleviate the risk of the ballots being lost, stolen, altered, compromised or destroyed.

    Especially since only the GOP, and it's private contractors chose the building and the location of the cameras.

    An audit needs to be bipartisan, or the outcome is heresay. And the use of an insecure facility is unconscionable. It means that the entire paper trail will have a huge question mark over it from now onwards. Possibly this is their goal, and that too is unconscionable.

    That's putting aside that their procedures are absolutely shit: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/05/19/gop-arizona-election-audit/

    [–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    Wapo is CIA/MSM garbage. Shill harder!

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    The reporter isn't the problem. There's dozens of them.

    https://www.ksnblocal4.com/2021/06/18/little-is-known-about-cyber-ninjas-company-running-arizona-audit/

    https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/17/politics/arizona-audit-cyber-ninjas-logan-invs/index.html

    https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a36534597/arizona-election-audit-cyber-ninjas-contractor/

    https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-arizona-business-technology-election-recounts-c5948f1d2ecdff9e93d4aa27ba0c1315

    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/556517-arizona-secretary-of-state-alleges-procedure-errors-at-audit

    The problem is the procedures are shit.

    But given your post history of making refutations without substance, you probably know that, don't you, shill?

    [–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

    Can you post anything that is not corporate msm propaganda and misinformation? Didn't think so. Keep following that flow chart shill. Here's another .06¢ for your alms bowl.

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    See, you can tell I'm not a shill, because I went and googled some stuff, included some links, provided some information. Much more than 6c of my time.

    But your post is exactly what a 6c shill would post, isn't it?

    Now we see why you're so desperate to divert the accusations of shilling onto everyone else.

    [–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    Why so defensive? It's almost like you have something to hide.

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    I'm not defensive. And I'm spending much more time constructing reasoning and providing evidence than a shill like yourself does. Because you only get paid 60c per post.

    But I am pointing out that you're a shill.

    [–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Wow 60¢ per post? That's 10 times what you make!

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    See again, you're ignoring the logic to just make your 60c.

    See? Links that aren't you're baselessly dismissed WAPO.

    You never take the time to present any evidence. That's how we know you're a shill, and why you're posts are a waste of bandwidth.