you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Velocity 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Don't mean to intrude, socksy, but I couldn't help but notice you are relying on a questionable site in an effort to push your premise.

When sites use cliche weaponized words to describe people they're targeting and then engage in grotesque slanders and egregious ad hominem descriptors, then they have outed themselves as being biased and unreliable for accurate information. It's almost like a teenager or someone with the mental capacity of one, is running that propaganda cess pit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's merely a site that studies political bias, along with disinformation and misinformation. Those who criticise the site cannot provide reliable evidence for their claims. It's rather simple.

[–]Velocity 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like most disinfo sources, it's a mix of some accurate information with false information. But clearly they're twisting truth on many of their claims.