BLM Leftists Attack Rand Paul And Brandon Straka Outside RNC, This Must Stop, Democrats Have Failed
submitted 3 years ago by Tarrock from (youtube.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AsInBeer 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (45 children)
After the silent majority roars this election, law and order is coming back in fashion.
[–]Klondike 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (44 children)
How do you figure? Republicans already control the government.
[–]Yin 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (16 children)
Democrats control those shithole cities.
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (15 children)
You're just jealous of the beauty of American cities.
[–]Yin 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun - 3 years ago (12 children)
Most of those American cities used to be beautiful, back before leftists and anti-white agendas "enriched" them into crime-plagued cesspools.
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (11 children)
Yeah that didn't happen.
[–]Yin 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (10 children)
Yes, it did.
[–]yishengqingwa666 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (9 children)
I live in one of those cities, and YES, it did. It's a shithole now, there are "protests" and shootings and car thefts every fucking night.
[–]Yin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (8 children)
Yes and Klondike isn't fooling anyone.
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (7 children)
Heh, ok. Maybe when Covid is over you could come to one of the cities for a visit and see for yourself.
[–]wrongthink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
The most beautiful shade of char.
[–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Ew, needles and feces in san fransisco
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (26 children)
They do not control the government or Trump would not have been impeached on false charges. They do not control the governments of the cities the riots are happening in.
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (25 children)
"False charges"? Uhhhh
Anyway he wasn't convicted by the Senate, because Republicans control the Senate.
And Trump still won't control the cities if he wins November so I'm not sure what the point is.
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (23 children)
Yeah as in found not guilty through due process of law where if the opposite had been established then he woulds have been found guilty.
You know, the rule of law.
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (22 children)
Dude the Senate trial was a sham and you know it. Don't even try to play that game.
Not sure why people act so smug that "See? My president got away with it" as if it's a fucking good thing. This isn't the Stanley Cup, you don't get a trophy.
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago* (19 children)
Yeah I will start another thread in politics and show anyone reading it that what you say is the exact opposite of the truth. That's to come. For now, note that you have ceased to grant legitimacy to both the processes of law and to the "other side".
You even accused me of playing a game. That's assuming I am disingenuous on a matter of great import. Who does that describe? Someone bad. Someone you don't need to respect. Someone whom you have utter contempt for. That's where you are, whether you know it or not.
This is very significant although you aren't aware of it. What it means is you have contempt for one half and more of this country who agrees the Senate did the right thing. And it's not just you. We ALL have personal experiences of being shunned or "excommunicated" from long standing relationships which were otherwise warm and cordial.
That's why I am here. One side, the shunning side, the cancelling size, but not the other, is hurtling us towards an irreconciable fissure. That is a bigger problem than you know.
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (18 children)
When the truth is right in front of you and you claim not to see it, the only thing I can assume is that you are being disingenuous. How can I possibly grant legitimacy to lunacy?
The "fissure" of which you speak is that one side cares more about "winning" and "owning the libs" than FACTS.
And you absolutely should be shunned for being proud of your ignorance. You and "your side" care more about pride than truth and it will destroy this country, while you simultaneously blame the other side for not taking better care of you.
But it's no use arguing. I've tried many times. You simply won't listen and refuse to open your eyes to reality. You choose the easy propaganda that makes you feel good, and will twist any argument that doesn't fit until you feel that you've won. Because winning is the only thing that's important to you.
It's a mindset I truly can't understand. The closest thing I have to describe it is a "cult", but calling it that will surely twist your panties. Yet there's no other word for it as far as I can tell.
And yes it is a huge problem. Good on you for recognizing it as such, but as is typical, you've misplaced the blame... Purposely? Knowingly? Maliciously? Perhaps, and perhaps you are someone bad.
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (17 children)
What exactly exactly is right in front of my eyes that I do not see. Don't run off at the mouth. Tell me one specific, refutable issue. I thought we were talking about the impeachment and whether it was legitimate. If you're taking about that, then I will IM when I have prepared my case. If yo're talking about somethng else, then you have to tell me specifically what that fact- not issue-is that I am closing my eyes to.
You say you've tried and people will not listen. I am seriously listening but you have to stay focus and center on refutable fact or issue.
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (16 children)
This is what I'm taking about. I ask "can you see the forest?" And you say "show me a tree." If you want to try to chop them down one by one, go ahead. It sounds like you're starting with impeachment--fine. But you may want to read the Mueller Report before doing so.
[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
The pretense (or lack of pretense) they manufactured for impeachment was a lie. Globalist lying media has claimed you as a victim.
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Exctly. Some people who would in other circumstances have been normal are so stuffed with the non-stop lying coming out of CNN et al that they're literally acting like cult members. Of course, they accuse you of being a cult member but that's part of the pathology.
No way to tell who's a troll here to soak up your time and energy and who is a cult member who might be deprogammed. Gotta be careful not to waste time on the former. The later is your fellow American / potentially-freedom-loving human being who needs us to help him, even if they don't know it. like it or accept it.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
It's All Politics
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AsInBeer 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (45 children)
[–]Klondike 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (44 children)
[–]Yin 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun - (16 children)
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (15 children)
[–]Yin 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun - (12 children)
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (11 children)
[–]Yin 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - (10 children)
[–]yishengqingwa666 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - (9 children)
[–]Yin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (8 children)
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]wrongthink 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (26 children)
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (25 children)
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (23 children)
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (22 children)
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (19 children)
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (18 children)
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (17 children)
[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (16 children)
[–]Yin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]AsInBeer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)