Twitter Censors Photos of Goya Beans as “Potentially Sensitive Content” Because CEO Supports Trump

submitted by scrubking from (thegatewaypundit.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RedEyedWarriorIndependent 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Freedom of speech and freedom of thought are dead in America.

"Oh, but freedom of speech and thought only protects you from the government!"

Such a weak argument spouted by utter fools. No. Big Tech has the power to influence the government by influencing elections. Hence, freedom of speech and freedom is thought should also protect you from Big Tech.

[–]DieCommieBreederScum 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"A private corporation can do whatever it wants" is literally the same argument school bullies use to take children's lunch money: I'm bigger than you so I make the rules.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Pretty much. Money talks. I'll scratch your back you scratch mine. Game theory 101.

The Unted States legal def. is a FEDERAL CORPORATION, hence money flow always.

It never was about the people's welfare.

[–]DieCommieBreederScum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It is ludicrous to watch the left jump through hoops to defend corporate censorship by defining it out of existence.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Right does it too. Look at the anti-semitism bill. It was a bi-partisan effort though.

[–]Trajan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Neither party is particularly good on freedom of expression or privacy. All I’d trust is that one will oppose the other for partisan reasons, but both parties will unite when it comes to growing the government.