you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Penelope 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

And that's mostly true in a perfect world, attacking the messenger is a loser's strategy. Though to play the devils advocate, would you trust as much the statements of a mentally ill person, or someone prone to emotional hysterics as much as you would someone who is stable and collected? Some doubts arise.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

a stance on a claim is inconsistent? i dont think so... hes a brazilian boomer

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

And a racist and ageist.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Not killing it today. Lots of shadowboxing though.