Israel say they carried out airstrike that Hamas claim killed more than 50 people at Gaza's Jabalia refugee camp

submitted by [deleted] from (dailymail.co.uk)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Hamas said it killed 500 people then realised people were there to check this time so the death count was cut by a factor of 10.

The holes in the ground are the Hamas tunnels under the streets collapsing. The tunnels collapsing caused most of the deaths along with the weapons stored inside them exploding.

I don't know why it's called a camp, it's an area of the city with normal buildings not tents.

[–]brimshae 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Hamas said it killed 500 people then realised people were there to check this time so the death count was cut by a factor of 10.

... and then Israel claimed credit for killing people.

You left that part out.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

including terrorists, who were storing arms in tunnels under the camp, which makes it a legitimate military target and the world is not buying the "oh poor us they bombed us poor pitiful refugees" line any longer

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

"Well, if those people who already had their houses blown up didn't want to be blown up they shouldn't have been human shields."

including terrorists, who were storing arms in tunnels under the camp, which makes it a legitimate military target

How many civilians, in your opinion, are acceptable casualties to kill one terrorist?

Ten civvies for one durkah-durkah? Twenty?

A hundred noncombatants per camelfucker? What's a valid exchange rate in your eyes?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

The terrorists are an existential threat to the people as well as the nation of israel. There is no number of persons too high when the alternative is literally your entire race is wiped off the planet.

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

How many civilians, in your opinion, are acceptable casualties to kill one terrorist?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

This is a red herring question

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No. I want to know. How many civilians, in your opinion, are acceptable casualties to kill one terrorist?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

how many civilians you got bb

because someone who is willing to kill all of them, is worth an infinity number of political football/human shields to get rid of him

still a red herring tho

[–]brimshae 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm going to take that flippant reply as literal and point out that you're a fucking bloodthirsty psychopath.