you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (12 children)

[deleted]

    [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

    What evidence convinced you that Covid has killed or seriously harmed anyone? Even the CDC reported that 95% of “Covid deaths” had at least two comorbidities. I’d assume most, if not all of the remaining 5% had at least one comorbidity.

    Does just arbitrarily saying that Covid “aggravated” those comorbidities causing death really satisfy their burden of proof to you, especially when the WHO openly defines “Covid death” as anyone who dies while having Covid (even if it’s by something unrelated like a gun shot to the head)?

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

      You just skipped my questions and went straight to, “because they said so.”

      [–][deleted]  (8 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

        You’ve witnessed “thousands of scientists” saying something? When? Where?

        Was it a public back-and-forth where the scientists (like Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Ryan Cole, Simone Gold, etc.) representing the opposing arguments were included? What exactly were their most compelling arguments, and how were they disproven?

        Personally, I’ve never seen any public conversation/debate on the issue. How does “informed consent” work without knowing all sides?

        [–][deleted]  (6 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

          If you don’t know their argument, then how can you say they have “no argument” and how can informed consent to be given?

          [–][deleted]  (4 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            Were award-winning, peer-reviewed cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr Royceberg’s opposing assessments also deemed “poorly argued?”