"Trust the Science"

submitted by zyxzevn from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Kyto113 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lol, you do actually Post quite a few reputable and quality sources. But nothing you post in those sources is controversial, I don't think people are not reading them.

On the other hand, your controversial material is backed up by random Twitter threads. Or best yet, the idea that a TV show included a fantasy tower that microwaved people being evidence that 5G was bad for you. It's laughable the disparity in critical attention that you spend on things that you agree with versus things that you don't.

[–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

idea that a TV show included a fantasy tower that microwaved people being evidence that 5G was bad for you

That wasn't what I was trying to say. I was saying that they like to announce the shit they do before hand, so that everyone has seen it, heard about it and accepted it, so that when they do their evil shit, they have their spiritual legalistic side dealt with. We are dealing with powers and principalities, and part of that world is the rule that free will is inviolate. They must get your permission before they cut out your heart.

As for 5G, if you wanted to debate the potential risks, then I'm up for it. I can bring a whole bunch of phased array, distributed source engineering that is in patents on navy weaponry ideas, demonstrate how the fires they were suffering had little to do with people, and everything to do with using the wrong cable sizes and generating resonant plasma in them (like a grape in a microwave).

5G, if used according to the communications protocol specifications is safe. It is the potential to weaponise it that isn't. Think gamma knife surgery and you'll be on a rightish track, although the 5G can be far better focused due to the phase array source rather than a neutron gun.

What is laughable, really, is your inability to engage in discussion to get more data before you share your judgements. Being woefully misinformed is a sin in this modern information age

[–]Kyto113 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The only judgments I've shared other than the kind of sources that are used in this site- . I also pointed out the glaring double standard with which you treat scientific sources versus those with which you treat conspiracy theories.

If you applied the same standards of evidence you use for the "official story" as you do for conspiracy theories, I'm sure your beliefs would change significantly...

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you are a leftist, with pretentious to intelligence.