Nope. They were blue eyed and blonde or red haired. WHITE.

Yes to the blue-eyes and blond hair, but even your sources say these are Levantine Middle Easterners, they may have the mutations for blond hair and blue eyes, but these people are genetically distinct from white Europeans with the genetic distance closest to brown Middle Easterners, not white Europeans. I guess this depends on how we are defining 'whiteness', how are you defining this quality? As possessing light skin/hair/eye mutations, European ancestry, traceability to the Steppe herders, or some other classification methodology? The whole idea of whiteness seems slightly ambiguous when people are using many definitions for what this means, I usually assume people are referring to genetic 'Europeaness', hence my assertion of non-whiteness, but I'm willing to accept a different definition

Nature is just narrative pseudo anthropology.

Your video of facts cited this paper as well to cite the Egyptians having Levantine DNA, in addition to one showing Levantine Israelis had blond hair/blue eye mutations. Its sort of central to the argument you are making, idk how you can dismiss this paper as pseudo-anything when your argument depends on this paper as well.

This "whitifying" of Levantine Israelis would also make Jews 'white', are you comfortable with this? I'd find it surprising if you were, given your fondness for whites and dislike of Jews