Morality and the pragmatic approach to statesmanship

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nazi Germany was both idealistic and pragmatic there's not a contradiction when your ideas are already based on natural order and soyence. Also about Lebensraum (Living Space, not OY VEY YOU DON'T DESERVE THAT LAND SPACE) Hitler wanted those lands to be autarchic not because of some cartoon villain 'muh slavs don't deserve it!!11' stupid shit, Germany didn't have a bunch of colonies to rely on for its resources and as a result its only option to survive in a world hostile to Germany was to expand so it had enough resources within its borders to not be crushed. It's pretty logical, I don't know why you continue to assert comic book Nazism constantly.

I agree with you though, but rightist philosophy I read never has any contradiction to the principle of being both realist and in line with higher values. I think Yockey is a perfect mixture of this and I recommend everyone to read Imperium, The Enemy of Europe, and The Proclamation of London.

[–]Edjean50 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do you believe Hitler wanted to ethnically replace the Eastern European people with Germans or just set up autonomous client states and just use their resources?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

neither