Biden: "If you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons."

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Your rifles can't do anything against tanks and helicopters. A single abrams tank or an apache helicopter can leisurely defeat any number of militias.

Why do you make so many posts like this? It's like your baiting us into explaining how a citizen army could overthrow the US government.

Everytime you post this there are multiple replies breaking down why you're wrong yet you never change your mind. Multiple war college professors have explain in detail how the US military would not be able to suppress a true citizen uprising. This is common sense. Militaries are set up to fight foreign enemies not homegrown insurgents. The government can't use tanks and nukes on it's own people for a variety of reasons. This entire discussion is silly and Biden was just baiting patriots into fed posting.

Why would Biden want to get rid of 'assault weapons' if they aren't affective?

[–]sylla94 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I agree but I'm wondering why

The government can't use tanks and nukes on it's own people for a variety of reasons.

[–]Node 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Because it would rapidly lose any remaining support, and it would be all out war. Cops live in houses in communities. Soldiers have families who live in communities. Blow Biden has family members who live in communities.

How many of them being burned in the streets would it take before the cops and soldiers decided they'd had enough of attacking their own country?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It depends on how passionate the soldiers and police are in carrying out a genocidal war. I would imagine military technology would have greatly advanced in time for an actual civil war and people in the army and police would be mostly non-white and inculcated with genocidal revenge narratives upon White people. They probably will be operating drones from the safety of an air conditioned room hundreds or thousands of miles from the conflict. They aren't going to nuke anyone because it won't be necessary because they have drones.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Multiple war college professors have explain in detail how the US military would not be able to suppress a true citizen uprising

Can you give me a link to such studies?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm really not comfortable posting these things anymore in our current anti white political atmosphere. It can be construed by outsiders as the "'terrorist dissident right' talking about ways to take down the US government!!"

Sharing war college studies about the weaknesses of the US government and the power of domestic insurgent forces can also aid foreign actors that lurk our subs for tips on weaknesses in the US military. As I am only a peaceful political dissident and not a militant dissident I have zero desire at this juncture to help or aide people willing to take down the US government in any way.

There are plenty of books published in the dissident sphere that go through what a civil war would look like. Those books reference some of those studies. You're welcome to support dissidents, buy the books, and read them. It's not really my job to extract and distill all this information for a stranger on the internet.

One very public event that I can talk about (And that I mentioned to you before) is the red team blue team 2002 millennial challenge war game conducted by the US military. Malcolm Gladwell talked about this famously in his book Blink. Here's a link to the wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

Long story short the team with less troops, less equipment, and old less techy equipment defeated the team relying on modern equipment and innovation simply because they had more experience and assertiveness. Considering most of those old school implicitly pro white military guys were fired by Obama and are still alive. Well, I'm not really very worried about nukes and f15s.

There are also many reading lists that were given to new recruits in the military years ago that talk about the value of a soldier and a rifle over the power of organized militaries. Again, that is literature distributed and promoted by the US military. That knowledge is out there among the white male US populace. Our strength lies not in our military but in the genetic stock that makes up such a military.

The greatest military weapon in history is fit aggressive intelligent white males working as an ethnic team with purpose. Even a casual reading of the actions of committed individual whites should make any group of people terrified of getting on the wrong side of white racial collectivism. You don't survive this long on the planet and not have the ability to defend yourself from enemies foreign and domestic. It's mind boggling to me how anyone could look at the history of white people and want to fuck with us.