#Coinciding Geopolitics Part 2

---

We all know the International Masters of Finance are pulling the strings on this never ending war. My question: WHO or WHAT pulls their strings?

Here we have, in 1998, the V.P. of UNOCAL urging the U.S. Congress to help the United Nations establish an internationally recognized government in Afghanistan so they can lay their oil pipeline. That was nearly four years ago before 2001.

"The only other possible route option is across Afghanistan, which has its own unique challenges."

"... we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company. "

"A recent study for the World Bank states that the proposed pipeline from Central Asia across Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea would provide more favorable netbacks to oil producers... " [i.e., higher profits for the banksters]

"... cannot begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan government is in place."

"We urge the Administration and the Congress to give strong support to the United Nations-led peace process in Afghanistan."

Source: Read U.S. House of Representatives; 107th Congress, 1st Session; 1998: Testimony By: John J. Maresca; Vice President, International Relations, UNOCAL Corporation To House Committee On International Relations, Subcommittee On Asia And The Pacific February 12, 1998 Washington, D.C.

In it, they covertly called for a war in Afghanistan in order to install a new puppet-leader; create a puppet government that will not impede their plan to glut the area of its vast natural resources... but HOW to start that war? How about terror in the U.S.?

But even if both pipelines were built, they would not have enough total capacity to transport all the oil expected to flow from the region in the future; nor would they have the capability to move it to the right markets. Other export pipelines must be built. This is just one geopolitical agenda of many which has blossomed from the pretext that is 9/11.

**#The NEOCON Think Tank Documents

---

Now for the 1992 DPG neoconservative plan, which called for:

• Huge increase in US defense spending.

• Assertion of US lone superpower status.

• Discourage industrial nations from challenging the US.

• Maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors

• Prevent emergence of regional competitors and new rivals.

• Adopt the use of preemptive force - unprovoked warfare.

• US should forsake multilateralism and act independently to get its own way.

• This forsaking of Multilateralism is counter to Eurasianist and Multilateral Zionists. Israel is the gate to Europe and Asia. They are in such a perfect geographical location that they can forsake multilateralism one day, only to turn to unilateralism another day.

• Ability to handle two major regional contingencies at once. (SW Asia & Korea)

• Foreign intervention in global disputes, even if not directly related to US interests.

• Make Milstar (Military Strategic and Tactical Relay) satellite communications network top priority.

• Show the leadership necessary to establish and protect "a new order."

In 1994, a new non-profit organization, the 'New Citizenship Project' was formed, with political commentator William (Bill) Kristol as chairman and Gary J. Schmitt as president. It was largely funded by many private neoconservative donors and right-wing foundations as well as democrat war-hawks. Their mission statement...

"An organization created to promote greater civic participation in our national life."

When it comes to neocon treachery, 1996 was indeed a very big year, because these same neoconservatives decided to get busy. Very busy.

They formed the US Committee to Expand NATO, which later became the US Committee on NATO.)

Neoconservatives Bill Kristol and Donald Kagan co-authored a piece called "Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy," another cornerstone in their plan for complete control of US policy.

Also in 1996, another dark document was conceived and written for the IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (Israeli company), with dire implications for the middle east. It was entitled "A Clean Break - A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," penned by neocon co-authors David Wurmser and Richard Perle. It formed the basis for the middle east wars which would take place post-9/11.

Most have given credit to Douglas Feith, but he now denies being a "main" contributor, although admits to be consulted on the paper before its publication.

http://newsfocus.org/images/pnac/pnac_perle_wurmser_feith.png

In 1997, the Project for a New American Century was finally born, the PNAC. Spawned from the skewed right-wing brain-trust of neocons who are really fascist neotrotskyites; William Kristol and Robert Kagan, their sole purpose was to form a new US policy... one that was overly aggressive and self aggrandizing, espousing the US as supreme over all. (In reality, the "supreme US" is all a ruse, which will be explained further on.)

http://newsfocus.org/images/pnac/kristol_kagan.png

In its founding statement of principles, just like the DPG draft, the PNAC statement called for U.S. global leadership and preemptive action, stating:

"Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership."

The evidence of a clear effort to take down the US becomes even more transparent just a year later in October of '98, when yet another dark document was conceived, called "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy."

"Catastrophic Terrorism"... as a National Policy?

Seriously?