Zimbabwe signs billion-dollar deal to repay white farmers

submitted by yesofcoursenaturally from (apnews.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Not to cultural marxists. Whites can't be natives anywhere under the lens of critical theory.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes but there is no need to use their language

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

100% agree. That's what I'm trying to explain to salos.

He made the argument that it's 'bantu land now'. Which is a dissident position (conquerors own their territory if they hold it long enough). Salos is basically switching around between philosophies to support black people and dump on whites. If he keeps doing it I'm going to ban him for misrepresenting his position (rule 3).

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ban me for what? I am consistent in my position, the situation in Southern Africa is unwinnable for our people, the Bantus won by right of conquest as did we in North America and Oceania. Right of conquest is how the world has always worked, whites have a right and a duty to hold onto and maintain what we have just like Europe done against Islam.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your words:

I don't support any conquerors,our people won North America,Australia and New Zealand by right of conquest,the Bantus won Southern Africa by right of conquest.

You just said, 'it's bantu land now' and 'whites should leave'. That's at least tacit support of bantu conquors over south african boer natives who have lived on the land for 400 years. If that's your position state it clearly so people can debate with you and hold you accountable for your position.

Which one is it? Your position is constantly changing. The only consistent position you hold is that white people need to retreat and that whites can never be natives. This is the exact same position a critical theorist that goes around academia warping the historical record to make whites the eternal aggressors.

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think the situation in Southern Africa is unwinnable and it is best to get our people back home to Europe before mass bloodshed ensues, that's my position.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And if the boer disagree with you? What is your position then? Should american and european whites stand by while bantu slaughter boer farmers that refuse to leave?

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In an ideal Nationalist West, they would have free access and naturalization aswell as some agreement with the governments of Namibia,South Africa and Zimbabwe to repatriate Whites in exchange for wealth. If the boers refuse to leave, that is on them not us.