you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Salos10000 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No thats projection. What he means is whites discriminated based on religion or culture or class. Thats uncalled for, hes here to debate don't get so aggravated by his words.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What he means is whites discriminated based on religion or culture or class.

So it's whataboutism and relativist tactical nihilism like I said then.

Whites aren't allowed self determination or to separate from other groups because whites at some point in the future may or may not have their own grievances between themselves? Really, you think that's an honest and serious argument?

[–]Salos10000 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Its valid from the perspective that a monoracial society is not free from conflict. Thats the argument we need to refute.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    My point was that his argument is valid in that monoracial societies are not free from conflict.I should edit it.