you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LifeIsSuffering 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If this were an article stating that radio frequencies in general might interfere with some level of immune system function, there probably wouldn't be much quarrel. Put 5g and COVID in a sentence and denial takes place, because only non 5g and infections other than COVID would be acceptable following years of indoctrination.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Because there is zero evidence and there would be mountains of it given that 5g is only active in some areas

[–]LifeIsSuffering 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Who would pay for evidence that could harm profits? Or, who would lose their funding, job and future in science should they damage profitable reputations?