U.S. Government Admits ‘5G Radiation Causes COVID-19’ – Stunning Admission - The People's Voice [7.00]

submitted by doginventer from (rumble.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (51 children)

Fake and gay.

There is no correlation between 5g and covid infections.

[–]LifeIsSuffering 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (50 children)

If this were an article stating that radio frequencies in general might interfere with some level of immune system function, there probably wouldn't be much quarrel. Put 5g and COVID in a sentence and denial takes place, because only non 5g and infections other than COVID would be acceptable following years of indoctrination.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Because there is zero evidence and there would be mountains of it given that 5g is only active in some areas

[–]LifeIsSuffering 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Who would pay for evidence that could harm profits? Or, who would lose their funding, job and future in science should they damage profitable reputations?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Who paid for the research all the other times that things were found to be harmful?

It is very costly to remove asbestose. Lead paint had valuable qualities that non lead paint does not. It's coslty to do all the safety things. Yet, that exists.

[–]LifeIsSuffering 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Asbestos is a fine example to support my point, thank you. It was first recognised by the US government that asbestos posed a risk to health in 1918, and asbestosis was discovered in 1930. Asbestos wasn't banned in the UK until 1999, some 70 odd years later. But few doctors would lose their funding for discovery of a harmful substance in construction. A discovery in the field of medicine that holds the field of medicine in disrepute though, is a different story. People don't shit on their own doorstep.

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

How? How would you come to have such research? Big cities all have 5G. In big cities there are more people, and that's exactly where you would expect "viruses" (if you are indoctrinated into believing they exist) to spread...

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Big cities don't all have 5g. Secondly, all those other factors can be taken into account when finding paterns. 5g is new, viruses are not. You can simply compare historical data of each place to contemporary data, and that would reveal a difference in change between places that got the G and those that still havent.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Viruses are more than new, they never existed.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

People get sick, therfore viruses exist.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

"I stand upright, therefore the Earth is flat."

Gotcha

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

I can explain how the earth can be round and gravity can pull people on both sides towards the center. Neither I nor you can explain how sickness can spread from person to person without bacteria or viruses. So those are two very different things.

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

VIRAL CONTAGION HAS NEVER BEEN DEMONSTRATED. You believe in it, that is clear. But NOBODY HAS EVER BEEN ABLE TO demonstrate "viral contagion".

But that's not suspicious to you because you believe it without any shred of evidence other than "he has it, and I have it" thinking that proves contagion. It does not.

See Koch's postulates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates