you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Circlesbadnews 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    I mean, you're right about people pushing these weird myths, but your wrong about Smithsonian, and any other source of "historical facts." Literally every organization with any influence stands to benefit from manipulating history in favor of whoever is donating to them, buying from them, or directing government funding towards them. That's the nature of humanity, and we will never know the scope or scale of the effects of it. And we'll also never know what is true or false about historical records.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Circlesbadnews 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      LoL that's not what I'm saying. Any specific incident, without proof, is just going to be a conspiracy theory. I just mean that we shouldn't assume the any source of information is not corrupted or is uncorruptible. That's just being way too generous with the quality of human nature.