you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Drizzt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Instead of providing observable evidence(archeological artidacts) the author of the paper infers a direct attribution of shaman to be applied to a wide variety of occupations already known to have been of the first. While I don't object to this as valid, it doesn't cement the authors theory for me personally. Cool article and I appreciate the post!

[–]Vigte[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah and it's never going to be quite clear who did exactly what first anywhere.

I mean is "gatherer" a "profession", what about hunter? It's all very subjective.