"Russia’s military casualties, the [U.S.] officials said, are approaching 300,000. The number includes as many as 120,000 deaths and 170,000 to 180,000 injured troops. The Russian numbers dwarf the Ukrainian figures, which the officials put at close to 70,000 killed and 100,000 to 120,000 wounded."

submitted by neolib from (nytimes.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]neolib[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yeah, and you know that because you listen to various pro-Russian propagandists like Ritter/MacGregor.

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

literallywho LMAO

[–]neolib[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well, name the source for "at least a third of a million dead" then.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

go read simplicius the thinker for a week and come back and let me know if you found it

[–]neolib[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why would I read a pro-Russian anonymous substack blogger? It's maybe entertaining (if you support Russia yourself), but it's not a serious source for anything.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

  • Name a source

  • (names a source)

  • Nooooo not that source!

Simplicius is an aggregator as well as an analyst. Last argument I got into here was with some retard that refused to watch a video of some advisor to comrade zelinskyyyyy who was saying russia had fucked up ukraines power grid. They wouldnt acknowledge the video because it was on simplicius' substack.

Don't be stupid, comrade. Refusal to look at the truth because you have been told to hate the messenger is very stupid.