Probably the weirdest superphobe argument I've heard is that our sexuality doesn't fit the definition of a sexuality. They are saying that a biological X wanting to be with a biological Y doesn't fit the "sexuality" paradigm they subscribe to. Like... I gotta say, if that's your take then maybe your definitions are bullshit. Do these people forget that we're each of us the end product of countless generations of natural biological pairings? Just blows my mind.
[–]79malibu350 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]i_hate_cheese_eaters 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun - (0 children)
[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)