all 3 comments

[–]ZephirAWT[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

‘The situation has become appalling’: fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point

This is just a top of iceberg: the scientific research indeed can not be deemed incredible because of 10.000 retracted papers of 7 millions ones published each year. There is much deeper and widespread systemic occupation and money driven bias, which manifests itself by pluralistic ignorance and lack of retractions instead.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Always test them with fake papers.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The article is really really bad.
Which is the normal for "the guardian".

Ivermectin works very well.
And Hydroxycholoquine works well. And many more. See: http://c19early.com for all studies.

The real problem is that Big Pharma is able to publish fake science into "top-science" publishers.
The articles that they published were all extremely fraudulent.

See: /s/CorruptScience/
For an overview of many such problems.

What I see in this article is that they try to hide the evidence for the REAL corruption that is going on.
Most papers are just publishing advertisement for big companies. Big Pharma, Big Tech, the World Economic Forum.
Most scientists are getting money and publicity by signing off on studies that they did not even perform.

And real science has been pushed away.
Because criticism of "the science" is not really allowed.

Even this article about fake science is fake science! That is how bad the situation is today.