Why do Incel forums always end up getting moderated by people like this:

submitted by EternalSunset from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My question to you: Why do you want your community to include incels? You seem to be more of a reactionary (I still can't find a good description of the term besides people who hate you)

Do incels just have a higher ratio of people who could become reactionary or is it something of an alliance that is useful because both groups are hated and hate the sexual liberation?

[–]Caamib_ 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Interesting question(s).

It's all intertwined. Take a look at fschmidt. He used to be incel in the late 70s/early to mid 80s America and only beat his incel once he looked in Mexico. I would never ever meet him if it weren't for the fact that I was incel myself and we met on an incel site. Being incel leaves permenent damage and makes you ask yourself things you'd never ask yourself if you were normal (or a "normie"). It makes you wonder why your species has rejected you and once you ask yourself that question it's easy to become a reactionary once you learn some history.

Of course, I don't want any of these modern incels in my community, and everybody sane would just want them dead ASAP and would thank God that they can't reproduce. But that text I linked to explains that incels weren't always such cultish scum. You may thinking I'm pining for the bygone "golden ages" but what if I told you there's an incel community like this even now? https://www.love-shy.net/

As for "reactionary", why not use the standard dictionary definition? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reactionary

[–]LadiesMan 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

and everybody sane would just want them dead ASAP and would thank God that they can't reproduce.

You were always a shitstain.

[–]JosephDeMaistre 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Funny how Caamib keeps labelling himself "reactionary". I'd say lots of items in his advocacy for sexual depravity such as incest and pedophilia would fit with modern progressives very well. I wouldn't be surprised if Caamib supports zoophilia as well.

But then again, in Biblical times it was probably quite common to wed 13 year old girls so maybe that's his special brand of "reactionary" :D