you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Sorry. You have been misinformed by the corrupt media.

Only the FAKE science studies showed that it was not effective.
Just pick any of them, and you will find a real problem with their method, doses,
information, timing, selected group, etc. These studies are NOT valid science at all.

The actual scientific valid studies did show that it was VERY effective,
when used early. Better in combination with Zinc and some more medicine.
It is confirmed by many independent specialists and many doctors in the field.

From a science point of view check the research as explained by the Youtube Channel Peak Prosperity by their medical specialist.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Oh really, please do elaborate. Was this a meta-study published in Nature, or Fantasy Land?

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Lancet was retracted because of complete faked data.
The first study in Nature was bullshit too, based on cherry picking. That was the letter in Nature you refer to?
Or did they publish new bullshit again?
The medicine companies are really good at it.

Because you are so ignorant, and maybe some others are too, I will make a small sourced list.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks..
That one is fake already..

I posted the sources in the top of the thread.
These 3 were discussed there.
I think you will like the Peak-prosperity videos.
They are following the science journals and are really thorough.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I woke up this morning and checked Saidit, and when I say my replies I had to do a double take.

    When I first looked, it seemed like someone was spamming one of the same studies I'd already linked multiple times the previous night, including in the very comments where I both linked and discussed the study in question. But surely no one is that dense, right?

    Turned out, yep, that's exactly what it was. So now I have to ask: what is it like to have the reading comprehension of a toucan?