you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

What I've found particularly sinister about the debate regarding Gender Critical is the 'free speech... you guys are living in an echo chamber... how dare you' bitch fits some people are having. I know it's bullshit and maybe everyone here does but in case you don't... it's bullshit.

I don't think it's bullshit though. And I'm female. I was censored at GC.

At GC, they are controlling the narrative. And I don't like that. They are creating the appearance of a consensus where there isn't one on certain topics that have nothing to do with being pro-women.

This is exactly why free speech is so important, this freedom to speak for yourself thing.

I was censored on GC for saying stuff that was not in compliance with the narrative, that was not hateful or otherwise rulebreaking. It just went against the narrative the mods were creating for the sub. One that was fairly hidden.

Well, now GC got banned from reddit for exactly the same reason. The lack of acknowledgement that they're participating in the exact same culture that created their ban bothers me, because they are. These women will go on and on about how horrible TRAs are and turn around and do the exact same thing on some other part of wokeism, because they believe in everything else.

There's nothing wrong with talking to people you want to talk to and ignoring people you don't. There IS something wrong with creating an environment where you're enforcing a narrative on participants, imo. I think tumblr/twitter-like platforms are often better for this reason. It's individual people who have full freedom to post whatever they want, they don't have to follow some mod's rules to participate. I guess I'm here though and I haven't made the switch, maybe I should since I keep thinking this. I think you see a way wider variety of ideas and aesthetics and stuff and more exploration there for this reason.

[–]nonpenishaver 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

My opinion clashed with many women on GC. I believed male violence and depravity was biological while they believed in socialization. I was extremely anti-natalist, anti-male children, and anti-heterosexuality while a lot of them were married to men with kids. I was never censored. Downvoted but not censored.

The only time your comments will really be removed on GC is when you come into the space completely challenging the basic tenets of feminism and demanding people debate you on them, or troll and ask stupid questions.

[–]radfem[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Can we talk about the heterosexual part?

I say this as a lesbian whos genuinely interested in how that would work for straight women.

[–]bald-janitor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

What do you guys think about the male question?

[–]radfem[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

In regards to what, exactly?

[–]bald-janitor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

In regards to majority ceos, politician, professors etc being males

[–]radfem[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sure, again though what exactly do you want to discuss?

[–]bald-janitor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Isnt it a little problematic that they are mostly males? Is there a need for more females in those position in your opinion and how should pinkpill feminists do it?

[–]radfem[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Firstly yes and yes and...

Just between you and I... we already are.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting.

The only time your comments will really be removed on GC is when you come into the space completely challenging the basic tenets of feminism and demanding people debate you on them, or troll and ask stupid questions.

That wasn't my experience. I don't think I ever demanded anyone debate me on anything, I simply stated opinions that people did not agree with. I believed sexual orientation wasn't or might not be a real thing, and I believed that people sometimes accuse people of being anti-<group> as a way of silencing legitimate criticisms of <group>. How are these "core tenants" of "radical feminism"?