The irony of this occurring right after the genocide of Artsakh

submitted by Cancelthis from (self.PalestineIsrael)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Cancelthis[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

"snitch "

You got the word right at the front of your brain.

Can easily see you working for the State of New York as a snitch.

Professional snitch.

Good one.

You are certainly a prime candidate for snitch of the day.

Time to start a new column - snitch of the month.

You might even get an honorary parking space at Google or Apple. Or at the DNC, or Harvard.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's an awful lot of topic changing. You had ample opportunity to defend your use of the word "genocide".

So now we have to deal with the fact that you called it genocide without truly believing it. Was it for theatre? Histrionics? A psyop? Why did you use the word if even you don't believe it. For effect? Poetic license? Why did you do it

[–]Cancelthis[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not sure why anyone should "defend" any statement, when encountering a clearly half hearted troll

You kind of remind me of the particularly half hearted trolls of r/politics.

You know the ones - the ones that are bursting with admiration for Ronald Reagan - and of course, Henry Kissinger, Richart Rorty, and the Bush twins .

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not sure why anyone should "defend" any statement

Well you're kind of answering my question there, actually.

I asked, why use the word if even you don't believe it?

You answered that the words you use, are so meaninglessness to you, that you don't see why you'd defend any single thing that you say.

That makes sense. You don't talk from your chest. You don't have fundamental belief in the words you use. You're not a man of his word. Your a hot air bullshitter. I get it now. Thanks for answering.

why anyone should "defend" any statement

I (on the other hand) will go to bat for what I say. On my word. I live by my word and people can tell my will from the force of my words, IRL and online.

I WILL "defend" any statement because I mean what I say

You're just a baby, a bullshitter, someone to be ignored, because you don't speak from the heart, your words are wind

[–]Cancelthis[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

why use the word if even you don't believe it?

English as a second ? Or third language ?

You might want to go to something past 2 nd grade.

One does not defend a "word". One defends an argument - or rather, a concept.

I know that is a struggle for someone who obviously doesn't grasp even the basics of reasoning.

Or, perhaps you are just digging things up via a mistranslated ChatGPT logorrhea.

You have been awarded the Cringelord trophy of 10 / 7 / 2023.

Sufficient for placing on a shelf, placing on a resume, or including in applications for work for the State of New York, the DHSA, or the Pentagon.

https://saidit.net/s/Cringelords/comments/bm11/forgettable_cringelord_yet_somehow_also_piquant/

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah in that case, I'm sure any second now, you'll defend the argument or the concept of a genocide where everyone survives by driving slowly away?

Somehow I doubt you'll do it, because you say garbage carelessly as we've already learned

EDIT - LOL muted what a scumbag. I can't believe you literally pressed the "cancel" button lol