all 6 comments

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The ex-senator has a theory, that Biden is secretly behind all the legal cases against trump, and that Biden is doing this because he's afraid of going to the polls against trump in 2024.

It's kind of a weird theory, because Biden already beat trump in the polls when trump had the incumbency, so really a Biden/trump showing would be zero threat to Biden. In fact, Biden, if anything, is probably trying to clear trump's path to candidacy, because Biden has a 100% chance of winning again. If anyone feels the chance of Biden losing the popular vote to trump in 2024 is below 100% then, please share your theory.

Additionally, the ex-senator hasn't accounted for the fact that trump has a long history of abuse, fraud and criminal behavior. Just take today's legal outcome for example: trump didn't just rape E Jean Carroll in a department store changing room by forcing his fingers into her vagina - no no no, trump had to publicly slander her for good measure. How the hell is Biden behind that?

So today trump is basically found guilty of defaming her as well as raping her....Biden didn't force trump to open his stupid mouth and defame his rape victim, trump decided to do that.

Perhaps the ex-senator ought to consider trump's criminal history of atrocious decision making before making himself look even stupider

[–]Cancelthis[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A good example of making a threat and being able to back it up.

But the reality is , Huckabee only has the state functionalities to do this.

She will use them, but ultimately, the only reason she will get away with it is because of the attorneys in Arkansas - and D.C. and New York, and Maryland, and Virgina.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

"She"? This is about Mike not Sarah

[–]Cancelthis[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That certainly meets the bill. Thanks. Much info.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fringe politicians alway ring in hoping they might become relevant.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is not an original concept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_boxes_of_liberty