you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (12 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted]  (9 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted]  (8 children)

      [removed]

        [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        You started the ad hominem when you accused me of gaslighting you.

        [–]SnowAssMan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        That's not what ad hominem is.

        [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Of course it’s ok when you call people awful things. And of course it’s essentially a hate crime cause I called you a gronk. How many times do you need someone to humour you and tell you you’re right about everything you think before you’ll go away and bother literally anybody else?

        [–]SnowAssMan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Oh look, yet another false accusation you're unable to substantiate. What awful things did I call you? An ass? Nope, that was you.

        [–]BiologyIsReal[S,M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        You started it, Snow. An houseplant has made it clear that she does't want to keep engaging with you. So take the club and stop right now.

        [–]SnowAssMan 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        She has a funny way of showing that. If anything I've made it clear I don't want to keep engaging with her. You've made your bias too obvious. You failed to reprimand her for name-calling, which has given me more leverage when I say: you're lying about who started it.

        [–]BiologyIsReal[S,M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        I did not lie. You were the one who started by making a baseless accussation (gaslighting) because she disagree with you. If you don't see how behaving like that is wrong, I don't know what to tell you except next time you through around the word gaslighting so caressly I'm not going to be lenient with you.

        [–]SnowAssMan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Since she is allowed to name-call me, am I allowed to name-call her? Double-standard in 3...2...1

        [–]BiologyIsReal[S,M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Enough with the spam and the acussations. You don't need to reply to every comment if you don't have anything new to add.