I think of the concept of peaking as like the straw the broke the camel's back - it's come to be used for educating anyone in any scenario about trans stuff, but I originally remember it as referencing your own peak, which was, when did you hit that tipping point that made you just go, oh, wait. This just does not make any sense! After which all the things that had been sort of foggy but accepted as politically expected became clear because the whole thing was BS.

So peaking someone else would be helping them to reach that last straw and get over the libfem stuff that's been blinding them, and that's why it doesn't work the other way, because the TQ version is just paradoxical. Being pro diversity is one thing but claiming that men are women is just misunderstanding the basic biological realities of the human bodies. That's why once you've peaked you see clearly that physical bodies are not performance art. We can build different societies that are better attuned to various individuals and don't expect the same behavior from people just because they belong to categories, but to just say the categories are non existent when they are literally how every single person is born is incoherent.