you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Lol, nope. Not surprised some dude thinks he knows the sexuality of all women better than themselves. Dude literally describes himself as a gender essentialist. He believes modern western gender norms are an innate feature of human sexuality. Might as well just wear a tin foil hat.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

I think he's right though. People in all cultures follow gender norms to a T, with the exception of people who have mental disorders. Brain scans can determine someone's sex with 95% accuracy unless they're autistic. Humans are both very highly sexually dimorphic and extremely collective, meaning members of the same tribe or clan will all be almost exactly the same. So nearly all the female humans will be one way and nearly all the male humans will be another. I say this because I am one of the very few exceptions and it's annoying seeing how stereotypical and group-minded other people are. It affects how they view me as well, and as accurately as it works on most others it's unfair to me.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Congrats on not being like the other girls.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

I'm male. Unfortunately, considering how much nature disregards me for that reason in favor of the female.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Lol, no idea what that means but mkay. Have fun with that.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Women have it a lot better than men because nature, their own bodies, and society all consider them inherently valuable. Men are only allowed to exist so much as they benefit women, and are highly replaceable to the species. I don't know of a single male trait that's actually beneficial to him except for a lack of breasts and periods. And physical strength, but that's seldom useful and usually not fun.

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do you have any to contribute to this sub or are you here only to post MRA nonsense that women have it muchhhh better than the "poor" men?

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think everyone has it hard but "benevolent" sexism is still sexism, and from my research women are much better off internally than men due to their brain chemistry and such. Externally it used to be about the same, now we've solved sexism against women but done nothing for and even encouraged sexism against men. Certainly from my perspective if I were born opposite I'd be much better off, though I admit some people might be the opposite as there are a few things men might have an easier time with. But nothing I'm interested in, and it's only hampered me.

MRA is not sexism. It's for equality. It seeks to get rid of both hostile and benevolent sexism to make things better for both sides. Caring about men does not make you against women, I find myself fighting real sexists all the time and hate that just as much. We act like they're mutually exclusive and they're not.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hahahahaha ok, wrong but ok buddy. MRA, incel, or both.