This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

GC: Why do you think it's not biologically essentialist and biologically deterministic to define sex on the basis of gametes and sex organs?

submitted by [deleted] from (self.GCdebatesQT)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (20 children)

To all those who doubt that GC people tell QT people to kill themselves 👆

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

They’re in the wrong but they’re also not gc. They’re here with the express intent of ~proving gc wrong~

The things they’re saying are disgusting tho. There’s no place where that’s acceptable.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 7 fun2 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 7 fun -  (5 children)

Oh come on. That dumbfuck always comes to say "sex is a social construct", now it's "self is a social construct". If self were a social construct, there would be no such thing as "suicide" because noone actually exists in the first place. I'm showing them they don't believe their own bullshit. That's the only way they'd understand.

You're here backing the TRA up now. Good job /s

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Touch grass and get help.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

They don’t appear to be QT either. Unaffiliated?

Thanks for that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

You think self is an illusion, so there's no such a thing as "death" for you because you never existed in the first place. I'm saying you don't even believe your own bullshit that self is an illusion or that species are a social construct. If you did, you'd go in the middle of the road and let a car run over you. Do it. If you don't, then don't dare tell anyone "self is an illusion" or "specie is a social construct" or "xyz is a social construct". Not even you actually believe it.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

Why would believing that the self is an illusion mean that I would go stand in traffic to try to prove some badly thought out point. Being willing to extinguish myself at a moment’s notice isn’t even inherently evidence of the self being an illusion so it would prove nothing.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

Because if self is an illusion, you don't exist. There is no "extinguishing" for you because you don't exist in the first place. Nothing is "extinguished" because nothing existed. Why won't you go stand in traffic, which again would be a social construct? What are you not willing to "extinguish" when "you" don't exist? And you know it?

Because you still know deep down your "self is an illusion" is bullshit. Fuck off and get out of my thread now.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

But why is that the case? If you said “prove that the self doesn’t exist by building an ice cream shop” how would my declining to do so prove that I really believe in the self anymore than commanding me to kill myself does?