you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

All I can say here is Queer Theory is wedded to (more like enmeshed with) relativity, and deep relativity can't admit constants and stable categories.

Arguments like this that QT advances --"GC is exclusionary bioessentislism" -- can't be resolved because they're inherently relativistic and can't co-exist with constants and stable categories, but routinely borrow-in the vocabulary of constants and stable categories to assist them in making their point.

They made this bed, drizzled superglue all over the sheets, and jumped in . . . they can have fun with that. Props to anyone who can keep engaging this solipsistic nonsense -- it will never leave the superglue bed because that, pun intended, is where it was conceived.

TL;DR yeah, red herring.

Edited for . . . well, what is an edit, really? If text is fluid, how can we say we've edited it? /s