GC: If race and ethnicity are social constructs and have no biological basis because humans share most if not all of their genes with each other, how can biological sex be real and not be a social construct?

submitted by [deleted] from (self.GCdebatesQT)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

I have always heard the opposite, which means that ethnicity is skin colour and so on and race is the social group.

Whatever the case, the point is still that one of them is the biological features, and the other is the social ones. You can see with your own eyes, and you admit that there are biological differences between a black person and a white one (concentration of melanin in their skin for example): same goes for sexes.

If you knew that there was a difference, why the fuck did you write:

What I hear most these days is race and ethnicity are social constructs and have no biological basis

You are a troll, find a better hobby.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (10 children)

Name calling like “troll” isnt allowed

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Calling out trolling isn’t namecalling.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

The mods disagree apparently

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Then maybe OP should start coming up with a different gimmick than posting the same thing over and over again and then ignoring the answer that is being given.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (6 children)

Maybe you should follow the rules. Also that’s not evidence of trolling

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Trolling is defined as creating discord on the Internet by starting quarrels or upsetting people by posting inflammatory or off-topic messages in an online community. Basically, a social media troll is someone who purposely says something controversial in order to get a rise out of other users.

Seems to me like repeating this specific question, after being told, repeatedly, that it' s bullshit, and being answered, repeatedly, is textbook trolling.

But you do you. I frankly don' t care about what you, specifically, think considering the stuff you have been saying in this sub since its inception.

If the mods think the comment is worth taking down, they are free to do it.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Bold of him to bring up the definition of trolling when he claims categories don’t exist and the differences between a cat and a shark are subjective.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL, true. My subjective opinion is that this is a troll, if someone disagrees then just remember that words have no meaning besides the one we give.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Reported for misgendering

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Them disagreeing with you calling it bullshit and the answers that were given is not evidence of trolling. Trolling is an intention, not being bad at arguing.

[–]Omina_SentenziosaSarcastic Ovalord 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can read this person' s mind and be 100% sure that it' s not their intention? Because I can' t, that was just my opinion based on the fact that the same question was posted a while ago by the same poster in different subs.

Also, this isn' t about being "bad at arguing", it' s about not even answering but just repeating the same thing over and over again despite unanimous replies about how it' s ridicoulous.