you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ColoredTwiceIntersex female, medical malpractice victim, lesbian 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

It is like saying that human are bipedal is reducing humans to our legs.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I’ve been told so many times that humans are ackshually not bipedal specifically because of amputations or limb ameliorations/duplications lmao.

If we acknowledge that it’s typical to have armpit hair are we armpit hair essentialist?

Reducing humans to some physical feature because to the people asking, a person is empty inside and their identifiers are what they have instead of personalities, interests, relationships, or anything that isn’t interesting to Twitter. A physical identifier being reductive makes sense if you’re already reducing everyone to a performance.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]ColoredTwiceIntersex female, medical malpractice victim, lesbian 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Sex is not about gametes themselves, but about body that is developedto support one type or another.