But he’s missing the main one, female genitalia, and has the main sex characteristic of a male- male genitalia. Sexuality is not about secondary sex characteristics- it’s about primary sex characteristics, and unfortunately for your example, the trans person in question has a dick. So no, he (the TW) does not possess the sex characteristic of the opposite sex that matter when discussing sexuality.

Can you explain please, how a heterosexual man is supposed to be comfortable having sex with someone who has a penis, regardless of their other (secondary) sex characteristics? Or how a lesbian- someone definitively solely interested in female on female sex, is supposed to be comfortable sleeping with someone who has a penis? Or how a gay man (someone solely interested in male on male sex) is supposed to be comfortable sleeping with someone with a vagina? Or how a heterosexual woman (female and male sex) is supposed to be comfortable sleeping with someone with a vagina?

You kind of need to explain how humans are supposed to somehow step beyond their very sexuality, and sleep with someone who has surgically and or hormonally altered their secondary sex characteristics to closely match the opposite sex, while still possessing the primary sex characteristics of their Actual sex. Even how someone is supposed to be open to someone who has an imitation of the genitalia they are sexually interested in, particularly when that genitalia may sometimes resemble the genitalia they like, but still doesn’t function the same? I honestly think you owe the sub an explanation, since you seem to advocate conversion therapy.

Also, are you saying that a heterosexual man is simply attracted to any person who has female sex characteristics? This logic would mean that any heterosexual would be attracted to any person who has the features of the opposite sex, and any homosexual would be attracted to any person who has the features of the same sex- but that doesn’t seem to be true in reality. People have specific features that they are drawn and attracted to as well as not drawn or attracted to. someone can absolutely possess the sex characteristics you say define someone’s sexual attraction (even tho you ignore the main one lmao), and still not be attractive to another person, sometimes specifically because of other features they possess. It sounds like you don’t understand sexuality or attraction. And I think you should look into both before you debate here, or else you’re gonna have a hard time. And run the risk of sounding like you support incel speak, rape culture, and conversion therapy. All things you claimed to denounce in another post.