The Rules

submitted by ISaidWhatISaid from (self.ContraPoints)

sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ISaidWhatISaid[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

AFAIK my sub is already delisted because it's an 18+ NSFW sub. If it's not delisted, I have no problem with it being delisted. If you are so hell-bent on getting a sub with only 9 readers delisted go ahead and ask Magnora to delist it, I literally don't care. I am not going to change my rules.

[–]ISaidWhatISaid[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

/u/magnora7 Can you please delist my sub? I thought it was already delisted for being 18+ NSFW. The above person is currently harassing me - falsely accusing me of being a TRA, a trans right activist, for simply disallowing the targeted personal harassment of LGBT people that want to post in my sub - and is also busy patrolling my sub to find faults with it because they disagree with my rules. I am not going to change my rules so please delist my sub if it isn't already. I want to give this person as little excuse as possible for harassing me because they disagree with my rules.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Sure, I just took it off of /all for you, that's about as unlisted as it gets here

[–]ISaidWhatISaid[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thank you! This person showed up suggesting that my rules violate one of your rules. I honestly don't know what they're talking about, since I do not restrict the posting of opinions with my rules, I only designed by rules to restrict targeted personal harassment of individual users, which is not the same thing IMO. Basically, I want a ContraPoints fan who has been censored on /r/ContraPoints and happens to be a member of the LGBT to be able to post here without being met by 1000 TERFs or conservatives bashing them just for being a trannie. Could you perhaps explain whether a sub aiming to prevent harassment of its users is the same thing as restricting opinions?

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]ISaidWhatISaid[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The reason why I adopted that rule is not because I want to censor TERFs. It's because I have seen TERFs take over forums (see KiwiFarms) and then vote-brigade anyone who disagrees with TERF ideology to discourage them from openly disagreeing with them. Also, the TERFs on Reddit and Twitter have long had a malicious habit of dogpiling transpeople just for declaring that they are trans openly. I can't stand those TERF dogpiles and wanted to prevent them from happening here on my sub, because I want trannies who have been censored on Reddit for posting on /r/ContraPoints to know that they can cross-post whatever got them censored there over here without fearing getting dogpiled for being a trannie on Saidit. That was the idea behind that rule. I literally don't give a shit if TERFs come over here to say their usual shit about how all trannies are fetishists or autogynephiles, I just don't want them targeting individual trannies that might want to post here. It was about respect for the individual (which TERFs do not, because they are just a flavour of SJW and are hence collectivists who are anti-individualism), not about censorship. Hope that's clear now.

    [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Depends on how you defend "preventing harassment" but it doesn't matter anymore as you're off of /all