Global Warming: CA Officials Tell Skiers to Stay Home, Too Much Snow
submitted 5 years ago by useless_aether from (breitbart.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (5 children)
The analogy is funny.
The settled science argument is a fallacy, in this case. The climate models and data was not maid available for peer review. The doctoring of evidence was revealed when the emails leaked.
Peer review and reproducibility weren't tested.
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (4 children)
The settled science argument is a fallacy, in this case.
Just because some people were faking evidence to further support the established consensus doesn't mean that the established consensus is now invalid. That's a fallacy too.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (3 children)
If the theory is legit then falsifying data isn't necessary. Data is falsified to fit bad theories.
wizzwizz4, I've noticed that you are inclined to support "established consensus" where data is falsified.
Is it really that difficult to imagine that we've been misled?
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (2 children)
That's because the non-falsified data is sufficient for me.
It's easy to imagine that we've been misled. I personally have been misled about loads of stuff! But, to my knowledge, this isn't one of them.
And honestly, you're being as short-sighted as the politicians if you think that this is about the money. I don't want us all to die. I honestly believe that this is one of the most pressing concerns. The legislation should be attacking the companies that are doing more damage than us plebs could ever hope to do, but that doesn't mean that we're not capable of doing little things ourselves to make a little bit of difference and buy us a little bit of time.
But no, just because you're spinning the narrative, I won't admit to something I believe – for what I think is a set of good reasons – is false.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (1 child)
I personally have been misled about loads of stuff! But, to my knowledge, this isn't one of them..
You should start your own sub, and this should be the title.
It's hilarious on so many levels!!! ;-)
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
For the record, this comment doesn't address the points I've made. You're just pointing a finger and laughing at me, while surrounded by a gang of zero.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)