The Jewish role in the Russian Communist revolution.

submitted by HibikiBlack from (self.C_S_T)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Yeah, but most of them got banished and / or killed by Stalin afterwards, so…

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

this is like how hitler did the transfer agreement. A deal with zionists for jews to move to palestine. Then later made their lives harder with concentration camps to encourage more to move like boiling frogs. The holocaust didn't kill 6 mill but around that many did move to Israel and also USA. Remember that like bolsheviks, nazis were jew financed (prescott a middleman)

[–]wizzwizz4 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Remember that like bolsheviks, nazis were jew financed (prescott a middleman)

Financed by some Jews doesn't mean Jew-financed, just like if some men pay for something that doesn't mean it's man-financed.

Also, I'd like to read further into that; mind to point me towards an article about it that doesn't make my head hurt from self-contradiction?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Financed by some Jews doesn't mean Jew-financed,

yeah it does and if any don't speak out that is tacit agreement

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

This isn't consistent. Jews are humans. Therefore, by your logic, if humans don't speak out then that's tacit agreement and means it's financed by all of those humans.

Obviously, you'll come up with a way of weaselling out of this with something that makes so little sense that I can't even argue against it, but at least I tried.

I'm also going to point out that you don't have evidence of who financed it; you're guessing that they were Jewish but your evidence, even when taken at face value, is just as easily explained by a framing.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

if you don't speak out you're guilty like a wheel man in a bank robbery

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

What if you're a bystander in the bank? Still guilty? Your analogy makes no sense. There aren't hundreds of get-away drivers in a bank robbery. It's a small group of people robbing a bank; not a few tens of millions.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

if a bystandewr in bank not guilty. but if then after the robbery cops ask you questions like what did the robbers look like and you refuse to help, guilty.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What if you weren't in the bank at all? Even if somebody had randomly emailed you saying "don't come into the bank", you still wouldn't be culpable.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

not being in the bank at all is like not being on earth at all in this analogy