Why I oppose sl*t-shaming: The real definition of sl*t/wh*re is not "woman who likes s*x" but "woman who CANNOT ESCAPE s*x". A wealthy daddy's girl who lost her virginity at 13 is not considered a sl*t, but a poor woman with a dead father who got raped is.

submitted by Kiera_Ramm from (self.BlackPillFeminism)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Kiera_Ramm[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's funny when people say that RF/BPF are just traumatized into misandry. While a lot of people around here do fit that description, it is incredibly optimistic to assume females in general even learn from their experiences. A lot of them like to take their denial of the experience to the point of parroting MRA talking points, like rape survivor Sydney Watson. I'm wary of traumatized RF/BPF myself not because I believe suffering is an invalid means of attaining gender enlightenment, but because they would have continued to be voracious pick-mes if they weren't traumatized so severely. StoryEndingNever is such an example: She dated nyggers in her 20s but only gave up when she got assaulted enough times.

[–]Kiera_Ramm[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then again, BPF who presume superiority because of their lack of adverse life experiences are just as contemptible. You didn't earn your relative freedom from nyggers. It's simply a matter of a lucky dice roll and I can tell that you would be a pick-me in less fortunate circumstances. Avoiding xy is the logical conclusion but if we were to be realistic, there is nothing we can do to be 100% safe from y-chromot*rd nonsense. Just accept that it takes a little bit of luck.