Why I oppose sl*t-shaming: The real definition of sl*t/wh*re is not "woman who likes s*x" but "woman who CANNOT ESCAPE s*x". A wealthy daddy's girl who lost her virginity at 13 is not considered a sl*t, but a poor woman with a dead father who got raped is.

submitted by Kiera_Ramm from (self.BlackPillFeminism)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Kiera_Ramm[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pick-mes overrate male considerateness because they know that they would never, ever be so merciful if they were in a similar position of power.

And honestly, they deserve to live in conditions worse than Saudi Arabia. They should have their faces rearranged and all traces of identity eradicated except for a numerical tattoo on their back, which is the only way they are to be distinguished from another. They don't deserve the dignity of attire. Leave them naked while they carry our palanquins and wave our fans. No adornment other than chains and security devices. If they get skin cancer from all that sun exposure, I don't have a single objection.

This is what females who reject separatism deserve. This is what slave paint wearers, wives (=single-user prostitutes), sl*t shamers, traditionalists, et al. deserve. The females who ally with nyggers over rape victims. The females who agitate against abortion, the females who enable androcentrism. They all belong in the lake of fire.