you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Immortallogic 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

This is not that convincing tbh, the other person in this thread sounds a bit like a hysterical religious leader trying to stuff some dogma down someone's throat.

I get that one of the basics tenets of BPF is biology, but a question for you. If you believe all men are biologically pedos, perverts, women haters etc, do you believe in the same sort of biological determinism for women? In that case, wouldn't all us women who will not have kids and are critical of womenly/feminine things/men/marriage/into radfem etc not exist at all?

[–]hunther[S] 15 insightful - 12 fun15 insightful - 11 fun16 insightful - 12 fun -  (3 children)

Biological determinism for women meaning what? That we're submissive? If we truly were, then history would not show pages and pages and pages of oppression and subjugation for women. History would then show us being happily and cheerfully agreeing with being sex slaves to men. Plus is does not cancel out the fact that men are like this biologically. Aristotle has views regarding women that was similiar to mohammad. Both men born different time, different era, different place but still had the same view about women.