/u/useless_aether

Well, it's a blog, so, what's true in it? The Holodomer was orchestrated not by Jews, but communist atheists. The commissars of the Soviet Union were a Jewish majority by race only, and/or who came from Orthodox Jewish families, but did not practice Judaism in the slightest...

[That is if one thinks Jews are a race and not just a religion.]

...which before WW2, ashkanazi Jews by other Jews were not considered to be Jewish because they converted to Judaism in the Pale of Settlement. Zionism, in fact, has created this flimsy narrative to further their agendas after the war. Most in Bolshevik Russia were atheistic and were considered apostates by other Jews anyway. But Jews of all colors, unfortunately, supported the Bolsheviks because they were poorly treated by the white army and the Czars. Though, nothing the Czars did to them compared to what the Bolsheviks during and after the foreign revolution did to the Russians.

As for the blog

---

The first picture is disinformation: https://holodomorinfo.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/22without-jews-there-would-never-have-been-bolshevism.jpg

It sounds true, and is but you mine as well slap your name on it and claim it because it is a fake quote like most other quotes on the internet. That alone makes me question this blog more critically. The quote supposedly came from Solzhenitsyn written in his book '200 Years Together.' It's not there and was never said or written by him. A reviewer of this book on good-reads, who gave it 5-stars was able to expose this and I confirmed it by reading the book and translating Russian forums to English who also tried to find the true origins of the quote.

All that being said, Solzhenitsyn book was censored in the US because he wrote about the Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution and the origins of Zionism.

I do not known if the Holodomor was a dry run per say but some make the point that it was a military decision, however, considering Lenin and Trotsky both advocated for outright terror, it is a credible position to take. I have a 10 part series on the Bolsheviks based on Solzhenitsyn's 200 Years Together, I posted it three times. The newer one is an unabridged version and filled with more information. Read it if you want.

Now, this blog is based on Order 171. I do not doubt that the Bolsheviks conducted this massacre. Most scholars now accept this.

It took me awhile to find it. But yes, if the order was enacted, it proves that towns were disarmed but because the Soviet Union was under Martial law, an order or law enacted by legality would not really matter. A simple decree in the Pravda would suffice, which did when they started executing people who were deemed to be anti-Semitic.

Order 171 is detailed in the book:

'Bandits and Partisans: The Antonov Movement in the Russian Civil War', by Erik C. Landis.

https://books.google.com/books?id=R2_53VhgmSkC&q=171#v=onepage&q=171&f=false

Here is the sources for the book, at the endnotes: number 6, 19, 21, 23, 24, would thusly go into more detail concerning this order. The source is from:

Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi voennyi arkhiv / Russian State Military Archive...

From the archives:

RGVA f. 827, op. 1, d. 13, II. 229, 336

So, yes it seems to be a real order. Thusly, the Soviets were keen on disarming cities and towns that opposed their will. Compare that to the Nazis, who although were ardent fascists did not impose gun control like that, but utilized other means of exploitation and forms of control. Nazis were therefore fond of private property and kept it intact as long as the person or business wasn't in direct confrontation with their will such as a boycott or if you became subjects to the state and were revoked citizenship as many Jews were in the late 1930's. This was much different than the collectivization and gun-control orders of the Soviet Bolsheviks. That pro-gun advocates seem to forget. They claim Hitler took all the guns away, which is a lie. Soviets enacted gun control on entire towns, and would torture and kill anyone who opposed their will. This included getting rid of all ownership of private property.

But it seems like it was relayed like other orders as a decree in the Prada on the 4th of July.

So, why did not the blog use a bibliography to link it? I do not know?