SnowAssMan

SnowAssMan · 2023-09-18T07:49:37+00:00

Has anyone else noticed the radical decrease in the usage of the word 'sexist', whether in the mainstream, or in the dwindling, active, feminist spheres on social media?

I did a search on Youtube for feminist/feminism & sexist/sexism, filtering the results by 'recent' (& limiting the length to longer videos in order to avoid "shorts" i.e. TikTok-hand-me-downs). In both cases I found virtually nothing, in the latter case all there was was Asian porn (who I guess were mixing it up with "sexiest") & manospherian content using the word in place of "reverse sexist" (the elusive prejudice against men).

I was suspicious of the word 'misogyny' being used exclusively by feminists of all colours – from the mainstream patriarchists in disguise to the radicals that oppose them. Words like misogynist/misogyny are far more difficult to type & say than sexist/sexism & as a result I see the former even often misspelled. I suspected that the reason for this change from 'sexism' to 'misogyny' was a way to be 'inclusive' of men with preferred pronouns.

This suspicion was confirmed after I saw this reddit post on AskFeminists, which, though still available to read, brandishes the label 'Banned for Misogyny' in, might as well be, scarlet letters, despite being anything but sexist:

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/16k6zl0/how_would_you_feelwhat_would_you_think_if_the/

The post in question asks feminists how they would feel if the most famous woman in the world was a man who self-IDs as trans & whether that would be good for women in general.

None of the responses answer the question, instead most of them get bogged down in the cure for cancer example that OP introduced & what a great hypothetical, individual achievement that would be. The rest of the replies, predictably pretend that the question is transphobic, simply for exposing self-ID's negative effects on the advancement of women's rights.

But the "interesting" thing about it is that it was banned for "misogyny" rather than "transphobia". If the word had been 'sexist', I doubt they would have been so bold as to refer to their favourite accusation of man-in-drag-phobia as 'sexism'.

I posit therefore that the erasure of the word sexism is a form of sexism, & it's replacement word 'misogyny' only further serves to erase the concept of sexism.

SnowAssMan · 2022-05-02T10:10:07+00:00

If LGB Alliance is for the rights of same-sex attracted people, surely that should include HSTS? Surely there are HSTS who agree with LGB Alliance, that sexual orientation is based on sex? But even in the case of people who agree vs. disagree, LGB Alliance says they stand up for the rights of same-sex attracted people (not just those who agree with them, I imagine) – shouldn't they include the T, seeing as homosexuality is overrepresented within the transgender population?

In the olden days, the understanding was that HSTS were a type of gay man, not a type of straight woman. So the T itself isn't inherently misaligned with the view that homosexuality & bisexuality are sex-based.

Isn't not including the T an assumption that trans-identified individuals are a monolith, with no diversity of opinion? I think the LGB Alliance would be more effective if they concentrated on excluding straight people, who like to harp as bi, queer & trans.

SnowAssMan · 2022-04-28T14:32:44+00:00

To me, FDS was the last bastion of feminism (of substantial size & outreach) on reddit. Now I guess it would be https://www.reddit.com/r/fourthwavewomen/ I felt that FDS was unique in that it seemed to be the most practical form of feminism I've ever seen, as well as the most accessible to the every-woman, without compromise. I feel like they come closer to understanding men (in a realistic & blunt way) than any other group of people.

I ask now, bc today the subreddit switched to 'private'. This development reminded me the events immediately preceding r/pinkpillfeminism's banning.

Here is a GC post from FDS (from the 21st of April): https://web.archive.org/web/20220421163817/https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/u81zze/never_forget_found_it_on_twitter_today/

I'm surprised & perhaps a little disappointed that no one on Ovarit has posted about this... yet.

SnowAssMan · 2022-04-07T20:51:38+00:00

If all GC feminists identified as transgender that would cause a major upset within transgenderism. If you truly don't believe in gender identity (as in, you're not attached to your own), & if you believe transgender identification gives you extra privileges, then what is stopping you from identifying as transgender?

Sure, what transgenderism refers to as "gender identity" may be undetectable, indefinable & inconsequential on the surface, but clearly there is something substantive to it, otherwise non-believers would en-masse identify as trans, not just Lauren Southern, since there is literally nothing to lose & quite a lot to gain.

And pls none of this "but I don't believe in transgender identity" or "but I'd be living a lie" cop-out. Transgender identity is a lie. The strategy I outlined would expose that lie, via mass lobby.

SnowAssMan · 2022-01-17T16:34:57+00:00

Apparently, there aren't any QT people here for the time being? But this is the latest question I ask them, should I come across one in the wild, usually in the context of sports.

Maybe you could try recruiting some QTers from this subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/FEMMEREDDIT/ The creator actually invited me to participate & I wasn't banned for over 24h & after not one, but two posts! The reason they gave for banning me was that they thought my comments would get their sub banned. It's been dead since my departure. There is an off chance that fear is stopping any form of engagement over there. Something they wouldn't have to worry about here.

SnowAssMan · 2021-12-31T15:18:25+00:00

If they did though, they'd probably have to identify as women to make a point, but technically that would make them hypocrites, since any GC person recognises the consequences to women's rights that men identifying as women causes.

What do you think?

SnowAssMan · 2021-12-29T10:20:12+00:00

The transgender debate is over.

J.K. Rowling said women are in danger of rape & murder by men, including men who want to be the opposite sex. Men who want to be the opposite sex responded by sending her rape & death threats, thereby proving her point & ending the debate once & for all, in an own goal.

J.K. Rowling wouldn’t be married to a man if she believed that all men are predators. She just recognises that female-only prisons, shelters & sports need to remain female-only in order to remain safe.

• Male sex-offenders have been assaulting female prisoners ever since they’ve been allowed in women’s prisons.

• Male athletes have been breaking women’s records & skulls ever since they’ve been allowed to compete against female athletes.

Trans-identified males are a type of man, not a type of woman, therefore it’s not “exclusionary” for them to use male-only spaces.

Men outnumber women in media, politics & crime, even when the men identify as “trans-women” & the women identify as “trans-men”.

A man who adopts a “transgender identity” is misgendering himself, since actions speak louder than words.

Demonstrably, male biology begets male upbringing, which begets male behaviour – if that doesn’t constitute a male gender identity then nothing does. Parents don’t mistake their son for a daughter during his upbringing, so he is never raised as a girl. Therefore, a man is male by BOTH nature AND nurture.

In short: a male gender begets a male gender identity. No amount of gender dysphoria, cross-dressing & cosmetic surgery can make a man any less of a man, or any more of a woman.

“Transgender identity” is not a mismatch between gender & gender identity, it’s a mismatch between fantasy & reality.

Even the scientific literature on the subject, like the DSM-V, describes trans-assigned males as men & never as women. There is a giant gaping chasm between science & trans ideology. There isn’t a single science excerpt that even implies that an adult human male could ever be a woman.

Male gender dysphoria ≠ female gender identity.

“Transgender identity” is an anti-science ideology.

People who are genuinely oppressed don’t go ape-shit over pronouns. Only the most privileged would do that. And sure enough, most people going ape-shit over pronouns are straight, white, middle-class & male.

“Transgender identity” is not an oppressed minority, it’s cosplay.

The trans movement combines the gender ambiguity of people with congenital disorders & the gender non-conformity of historical gay people & gay minors to try to piece together a Frankenstein identity of its own, called “transgender identity”. Likewise, the trans movement replaces “black lives matter” with “trans lives matter”.

The trans movement is a parasitic movement.

According to a survey, the “trans” “suicide” rate is 41%. Problem is, dead bodies can’t take a survey. According to a body-count, the “trans” suicide rate is under 1%. So 41% is a lie, while 1% is the truth. Which number have you heard from trans activists? Surprise, surprise, habitual liars told you a lie instead of the truth. A fake suicide rate is the only way they’ve managed to pressure you into complying with their ridiculous demands, like getting you to call men “women”.

They are clowns trying to recruit you & the world into their circus. They failed.

The transgender debate is over. “Trans-woman” is a euphemism for “male woman”. There is no such thing as a “male woman”, therefore there is no such thing as a “trans-woman”. A man who wants to be female & pretends to be female will never amount to being female. ‘Woman’ ‘girl’ & ‘female’ are not unisex terms. Language & law are not playgrounds for men’s gender-swap role-play.

Remember, it costs trans-identified males literally NOTHING to continue using the male-only terms & spaces that they used before they identified as trans. Any movement conspiring to make the aforementioned single-sex terms & spaces unisex, is an anti-woman hate group that values male role-play over female safety.

Pass it on.

SnowAssMan · 2021-11-06T09:05:24+00:00

Sailor Uranus: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChKl_rkCdJVjwfaVskornKg/videos

Same Sex Attracted & Cancelled: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdbv-HzWGbi3CySiPDz8fEw

SnowAssMan · 2021-09-28T07:35:47+00:00

Sorry, I couldn't settle on just one question:

Is there such a thing as a man who wants to be a woman?
What’s the difference between men & women?
If “sex & gender are not the same thing” then why do transGENDER people try to alleviate their GENDER dysphoria by taking cross-SEX hormones?
Why is every transgender sex offender male?
If a member of the male sex is trying but failing to pass as the opposite sex, is he “living as a woman” or “living as a cross-dresser”?
If both gay men’s brains & same-sex attracted transsexuals’ brains have similarities with straight women’s brains, are gay men women, or are same-sex attracted transsexuals gay men?
What word can we use to describe adult members of the female sex, since your ideology insists that ‘woman’ should exclude some adult members of the female sex?
Isn’t erasing & appropriating the female sex by co-opting the words: ‘girl’, ‘woman’ & even ‘female’ sexist?

9 a) If the majority of early-onset dysphorics desist before adulthood & end up gay (according to every study on desistance), then isn’t encouraging dysphoric gay kids to transition into being “straight” quite literally gay conversion therapy?

b) If desistance is natural & cures dysphoria, while transition isn’t & doesn’t, then why encourage transition & discourage desistance, instead of the other way around?
Is exclusive same-sex attraction “transphobic”?

SnowAssMan · 2021-06-15T01:04:57+00:00

In our culture gay & lesbian people are about 5% of the population, while people who identify as trans are under 1%.

So if muxes, mak nyahs, two spirit, xanith, mukhannathun, etc. are all trans, then why are trans people so common in these tiny-ass populations & where are the 10x more gay people in their respective cultures?

(Apparently in Brazil "trans-womxyn" used to be called "mariconas" – hmm, I wonder why).

SnowAssMan · 2021-06-14T21:04:34+00:00

Reddit appears to have a zero tolerance policy. If you comment or post in a reddit sub, you'll get banned immediately. If you create your own sub, it gets banned within a very short space of time.

On Twitter, you're allowed for the most part exist in an echo-chamber, but if you reply to anyone, no matter how benign, it will be used to ban you & even if you appeal it, they are steadfast. Here's an example of a so-called "violation" of the Twitter Rules:

@******* Meanwhile, you can't even define: woman.

Youtube seems to be the most tolerant, in my opinion. I'm not really familiar with Instagram or TikTok. Downside to Youtube is it's much more time consuming to make videos & harder to be anonymous.

SnowAssMan · 2021-03-24T08:25:51+00:00

Caitlyn Jenner has sired several children, only possible from being male, yet even implying that Jenner is male is considered transphobic. However, beyond that often, if not always, the adjective used to describe someone like Jenner is 'female', not male, nor feminine.

If the word 'male' is banned because it could imply something beyond biology, then why should 'female' be fine? Is it because you don't mind implying that men who self-ID as women have female biology? In fact, are you quite keen on it?

Can you not see how some people would consider missexing sexist via erasure? Why should self-ID take such precedence that it doesn't just override, but overwrites sex? Jenner owes a gold medal & several children to belonging to the male sex. Why should it be considered so criminally obscene to use the correct sex when talking about someone, when their sex is so integral to a person's life?