Republicans support this bill. Trump told a number of Republicans NOT to sign it, because he wants to continue creating problems in order to campaign on hatred.

submitted by no_u from (twitter.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

shit take on trumps motive

[–]no_u[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Look it up, or visit the links I provided.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

nah

[–]no_u[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

or stfu - your choice - no worries

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't have to listen to haters to know you're wrong LOL

[–]no_u[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

we're not discussing 'haters'

what a 7-year-old thing for you to say

[–]SLICK-RICK 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

we're not discussing 'haters'

what a 7-year-old thing for you to say

In the realm of discourse, it is imperative to engage in thoughtful and constructive dialogue. Employing derogatory terms such as "haters" not only stifles productive conversation but also perpetuates a hostile environment. When engaging in discussions, it is crucial to prioritize respect, empathy, and a genuine desire to understand diverse perspectives. Categorizing individuals as "haters" is dismissive and fails to acknowledge the nuances and complexities of human thought and emotion. It suggests that those who hold differing viewpoints are inherently malicious or irrational, which is a gross oversimplification. We must recognize that people's opinions are often shaped by their unique experiences, values, and beliefs. Dismissing them as "haters" not only fails to address their concerns but also alienates them further. Moreover, labeling someone as a "hater" often serves as a shield to avoid engaging with their arguments. It allows individuals to dismiss opposing viewpoints without critically examining their validity. This can lead to the creation of echo chambers, where people only interact with those who share similar views, reinforcing their own biases and preventing intellectual growth. Furthermore, using the term "hater" is counterproductive in fostering meaningful dialogue. When people feel attacked or marginalized, they are less likely to be receptive to new ideas or perspectives. This can lead to further polarization and a breakdown in communication. To foster productive discussions, it is essential to approach conversations with an open mind and a willingness to listen and understand. This does not mean agreeing with every viewpoint, but it does mean acknowledging the validity of others' perspectives and engaging in respectful dialogue. Instead of resorting to labels, we should focus on engaging in civil discourse. This involves presenting arguments clearly and concisely, supporting them with evidence, and being open to counterarguments. It also means being respectful of others' opinions, even if we disagree with them. It is important to remember that everyone has the right to express their thoughts and opinions, and that these expressions should be met with respect and consideration. By fostering a culture of open dialogue and respectful disagreement, we can create a society where diverse perspectives are valued and where meaningful conversations can thrive. In conclusion, using the term "hater" is not only dismissive and disrespectful but also counterproductive in promoting meaningful dialogue. To foster productive discussions, we must prioritize respect, empathy, and a genuine desire to understand diverse perspectives. By engaging in civil discourse, we can create a society where diverse perspectives are valued and where meaningful conversations can thrive.

[–]musky-the-nigger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nigger

[–]ASS-BURGERS 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have to listen to haters to know you're wrong LOL

In the vast expanse of the digital realm, where information flows like an untamed river, it is imperative to develop the ability to discern truth from falsehood, substance from noise. The advent of social media platforms and the democratization of content creation have ushered in an era where everyone has a voice, and opinions often masquerade as facts. This proliferation of information, while empowering, also presents a unique challenge: how do we navigate this sea of data and identify reliable, credible sources? The temptation to dismiss dissenting opinions as mere "haters" is a dangerous trap that can lead us down a path of intellectual isolation and self-reinforcement. True growth and understanding come from engaging with diverse perspectives, even those that challenge our own beliefs. It is through this exchange of ideas that we refine our understanding of the world and develop a more nuanced and comprehensive perspective. Seeking Truth: Embracing Intellectual Curiosity and Critical Thinking The pursuit of truth should be an active and continuous endeavor, fueled by intellectual curiosity and a willingness to question assumptions. Rather than blindly accepting information at face value, we must adopt a critical mindset, interrogating claims, examining evidence, and seeking out multiple sources to corroborate information. This process of critical evaluation helps us separate fact from fiction and form informed opinions based on a solid foundation of knowledge. Avoiding Confirmation Bias: Resisting the Echo Chamber Effect One of the greatest pitfalls in the digital age is the tendency to gravitate towards information that confirms our existing beliefs, a phenomenon known as confirmation bias. This tendency leads us to seek out sources that align with our worldview while avoiding those that challenge it. The result is an echo chamber, an environment where our beliefs are constantly reinforced, leading to a distorted and incomplete understanding of reality. To counteract confirmation bias, we must actively seek out diverse viewpoints, even those that make us uncomfortable or challenge our deeply held beliefs. This conscious effort to expose ourselves to alternative perspectives broadens our understanding and helps us identify potential blind spots in our own thinking. Evaluating Sources: Assessing Credibility and Reliability In the digital realm, not all sources are created equal. Some are trustworthy and provide accurate information, while others may be biased, misleading, or even intentionally deceptive. To navigate this complex landscape effectively, it is crucial to develop the ability to evaluate sources and assess their credibility. Consider the following factors when evaluating a source: * Authorship: Who is the author? Do they have expertise in the subject matter? Are they affiliated with any organization or institution that may influence their perspective? * Publication: Where is the information published? Is it a reputable news organization, a peer-reviewed academic journal, or a personal blog with no editorial oversight? * Evidence: Does the source provide evidence to support its claims? Are the sources cited reliable? Are the statistics accurate and up-to-date? * Transparency: Is the source transparent about its funding and potential conflicts of interest? Does it disclose any biases or limitations in its analysis? Respectful Dialogue: Engaging in Constructive Discourse While it is important to challenge misinformation and hold people accountable for spreading false or misleading information, it is equally crucial to engage in respectful dialogue and avoid personal attacks. When engaging with those who hold different opinions, strive to: * Listen actively: Give others the opportunity to express their views without interrupting or dismissing them. Pay attention to their arguments and try to understand their perspective. * Ask questions: Seek clarification and ask questions to better understand the reasoning behind their beliefs. This demonstrates a genuine interest in their point of view and can foster a more productive conversation. * Be open-minded: Be willing to consider alternative viewpoints and examine your own beliefs critically. Be receptive to new information and evidence that may challenge your current understanding. * Avoid ad hominem attacks: Refrain from attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. Ad hominem attacks derail productive conversations and do nothing to advance understanding. Conclusion: A Call for Intellectual Humility and Open-mindedness Navigating the digital landscape and discerning truth from falsehood requires intellectual humility, open-mindedness, and a willingness to engage with diverse perspectives. It is through this commitment to critical thinking, source evaluation, and respectful dialogue that we can navigate the complexities of the digital age and make informed decisions based on a solid foundation of knowledge.