Anti-democracy fascists in Canada's House of Commons repeatedly demanding apologies for Trudeau appropriately calling them Nazi supporters

submitted by [deleted] from (reddit.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yep - that's my point. I think Saiditors are tired of seeing this excuse by some people who - because of their ancestry - do not believe they can be criticized for supporting hate groups. For example, the anti-semitism arguments are so worn out that one can see aparthied Israel as a neo-Nazi state, but can be called anti-semitic for saying this. There are also well-known neo-Nazi supporters of the trucker protests.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There are also well-known neo-Nazi supporters of the trucker protests.

So what, there are also well known marxist supporters and well known liberal supporters. So what? What's your logic?

Quite a few American nazis supported Obama as president over McCain. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a4719/racists-support-obama-061308/ so by your logic Obama was a nazi too.

Then we have everyone's favorite black politician, Justin Trudeau https://saidit.net/s/canada/comments/8xlt/trudeau_says_conservatives_stand_with_nazis_this/

Of course guilt by association, which you seem to live by, was an actual nazi policy.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So - you're an admin now, and your 3 responses to me 2 hours ago are just attacks, with minimal relevance to the main points about political attacks against Trudeau, with the partial exception of one of these notes. All three responses from you are forms of whataboutism and forms of attack, rather than points of discussion that address the topic of attacks on Trudeau from politicians using WWII history as their reasons. I'll respond to your points when you show an interest in a discussion. Saidit is what it is because of responses like yours.

[–]AntarchomachusAnarchist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All three responses from you are forms of whataboutism and forms of attack, rather than points of discussion

Your entire post is a whataboutism. You are clearly sealioning, as I know you aren't stupid enough not to see how absurd these arguments are

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(It's not sealioning to respond to someone who responded to me. Jet approached me, not the other way around. Moreover, I am not making 'arguments'; I am telling Jet that I will not respond to attacks, but will respond to discusission. Same goes for you.)