censorship

censorship

log in
sign up
subreddits
search
sidebar

DOUGLAS MURRAY: Army of overgrown babies are invading our bedrooms(self)

200 points199 points202 points submitted by Uranian

Questionable 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Yagh sure. I also eat babies! Got any other idiotic words you would like to put in my mouth or are you done now?

wecandobetter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

No no, you think that speech someone considers hateful should be banned because it's wrong according to your morals. Or if I'm wrong, how bout you explain to me what it is you DO mean. Would love to hear it.

Questionable 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

You are literally telling me what I think and what my morals are. I can't explain shit to you. It's clear that the only things you understand are the thoughts currently occupying your head. And I doubt that you would love to hear from me. It's more likely that you are being facetious and would love to argue. Now if you truly wish to understand me, look around this very comment thread for current statements I've made on this topic.

wecandobetter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Oh yes, protest loudly then refuse to engage. Classic. Please, PLEASE explain: what kind of free speech is acceptable, and what kind of free speech is not according to you? Edit: and damn right I want to argue. Argument of beliefs is their lifeblood, their gym, their training grounds. If you can't argue for your beliefs, you don't have them.

Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

"Oh yes, protest loudly then refuse to engage. Classic."

Protest who you? Refuse to enrage on what? My reply was somehow not an engagement? Classic of what?

"Please, PLEASE explain: what kind of free speech is acceptable, and what kind of free speech is not according to you?"

At no point did I say anything about free speech, I have no idea what you are talking about. Again you are making up things in your head. Pay attention to the conversation we are having. Not the one you are making up inside your head.

Edit: and damn right I want to argue.

When a person accuses someone of wanting to argue, it is an accusation that, that person is filled with rage, and does not care about right or wrong. That they thrive on anger. That they wish to scream loudly and fill their blood with adrenaline for the pure thrill of it. That they are not thinking. That was the accusation I made of you, here. I did not accuse you of being idealistic, or staunch believer in a cause. I accused you of being "factious" and "Loving to argue".

Argument of beliefs is their lifeblood, their gym, their training grounds. If you can't argue for your beliefs, you don't have them.

I don't even know who you are talking about. And I would like to remind you, that I was talking about you, and your wish to argue, and you are talking about? Some mythical 'they' that has a meta gym in their head.

Nothing you just said is right. People can have beliefs without being filled with anger or rage as you seem to be. They can even have conversations and debates, and even get along with people with different beliefs.

And as I have previously stated, if you truly wish to understand me, and what my point was here, look around this very comment thread for current statements I've made on the article. I made this comment earlier, but since you chose to ignore it, and did no reading, I will now point you directly at the comment that I was attempting to guide you towards, which is here.

Now as for the head cannon gym inside your skull. You are doing just fine on frontal lobe presses, but make sure you don't skip cerebellum day. You'll be all unbalanced and the ladies don't like that.